Our firm was approached to provide a legal opinion on contracts signed on Torrevisa’s Golden Sun development. The opinion is based on several contracts, service of process writs and lawsuits we have been shown by existing buyers.
Author Archives: admin
A subpoena is set to be served for Colin Thomas, of Town Hill, to appear in Madrid as a class action lawsuit against Spanish developer Ricardo Miranda Miret continues to rumble on in an effort to recover money on behalf of dozens of Ocean View Properties (OVP) victims.
The criminal claim for fraud and misappropriation of funds was lodged in a Madrid court last year and included Mr Thomas and other directors of his firm.
The prosecuting lawyer is seeking more than £6.5 million in damages for 70 claimants.
The firm took deposits worth around £80,000 each from British investors, but much of the cash disappeared as the homes failed to materialise, it is alleged.
Antonio Flores, the Spanish prosecuting lawyer from Marbella-based firm Lawbird, said: “We have requested that Colin Thomas specifically is summoned and quizzed.
“I don’t believe OVP knew anything about what was going on but they will be forced to talk in court.
“This was a scam of huge proportions. It has the potential of becoming one of the biggest property scams, as none of the developments will be built.” Mr Thomas’s company was behind a number of successful enterprises but ran into difficulties when it became involved as an agent for Spanish developer Ricardo Miranda Miret.
More than a thousand British investors who paid £45 million for off-plan overseas property developments have lost their money after the firm was formally dissolved in 2009 with the appointment of liquidators Grant Thornton.
The Madrid court claims are linked with developments that never materialised at the Estepona Country Club on the Costa del Sol and Punta Perla, in the Dominican Republic.
This comes after the Mail revealed that The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and Staffordshire Police would take ‘no further action’ following the collapse of OVP.
Last year, the Mail also revealed that 50- year-old Mr Thomas was banned from being a company director for nine years after an Insolvency Service investigation revealed that he had pocketed almost £14 million despite the firm being insolvent.
The findings also showed that his firm took £23 million from customers for a Spanish development that it did not own, did not have a building licence for and never undertook any construction work on.
Despite efforts by the Mail, neither Mr Thomas nor his advisors were unavailable for comment.
The Audiencia Nacional insists there is not enough evidence to merit launching a criminal investigation despite the group of 20 foreign residents filing over 200 pages of documents against several Scandinavian banks.
“This is a clear case of judicial apathy by the Court which, after probably not reading the claim, considered it nevertheless irrelevant in what is a steadily worsening record of protecting rights of consumers,” said Antonio Flores from Marbella law firm Lawbird who is representing the Malaga victims.
But offering a ray of hope to the hundreds of expats affected, the Danish government on the other hand has now decided to open an investigation into the scam.
“It does not sound very good if a Danish bank is involved in such a concept. It will be included in our priorities” insisted Johnny Hansen Schaadt, director of The Danish Tax Office Special Department of Economic Crime.
Marbella (Málaga), 25 ene.- Un total de 35 personas han ratificado hoy en el juzgado de Instrucción número 4 de Marbella (Málaga) la querella interpuesta contra la inmobiliaria MacAnthony por presenta estafa y apropiación indebida.
Los afectados, en su mayoría procedentes de Irlanda y Reino Unido, han acudido a las puertas del juzgado a manifestarse y a ratificar la querella que interpusieron el pasado junio por la compra de unos muebles, que nunca llegaron, para las viviendas que adquirieron a la compañía querellada.
El abogado que lleva el caso, Luis González Ordóñez, ha explicado que la presunta estafa consiste en que “el grupo MacAnthony se ha apropiado de unos 500.000 euros a través de la ficción de que el dinero que se recibía era al objeto de poder comprar unos muebles en las viviendas que estaban comprando ellos en terceros países” y que “jamás llegaron a recibir”.
Por otro lado, el abogado ha asegurado que “la empresa ha desaparecido de forma irregular, sin llevar a cabo ninguna liquidación ordinaria, ningún concurso ni forma normal de desaparición”, el administrador tampoco quiere saber nada, y la empresa que tenía enMadrid y en Marbella ya no está, y nadie atiende a las llamadas ni a los correos electrónicos.
“No estamos hablando sólo de un dinero que ha desaparecido”, ha precisado el jurista, “sino de una fórmula tendente a engañar para la apropiación y quedarse con el dinero a través de un complejo societario, que es el grupo MacAnthony”, ha asegurado.
La empresa MacAnthony Realty Internacional SL estaba participada en un noventa por ciento por una empresa peruana, cuyo administrador es un testaferro de 90 años con domicilio en Perú, y que a su vez apoderaba a terceras personas, que son los administradores de facto, ha explicado González.
El letrado ha indicado que a los 35 afectados que representa se les ha estafado en torno a medio millón de euros, y a cada individuo entre 10.000 y 30.000 euros para bienes muebles.
Se les acusa por los delitos de estafa y apropiación indebida en tanto en cuanto “se presentaban como mediadores para la trasmisión de unos muebles que estos señores jamás han visto, con el agravante de que tienen que venir a España y tienen que presentar una querella aquí”, ha señalado.
Más de 30 británicos se concentraron ayer en los juzgados de instrucción de Marbella, ubicados en la avenida Mayorazgo. Portaban carteles en los que preguntaban dónde está su dinero y dónde están sus muebles, en señal de protesta. Se declaran afectados por un engaño masivo que les hizo perder un total de 500.000 euros, un dinero que estaba destinado para comprar unos enseres para sus viviendas que nunca llegaron a tener.
Ayer, acudieron a ratificar su querella en contra de la empresa MacAnthony Realty Internacional, la entidad a la que acusan de estafa y apropiación indebida; una empresa con sede en Marbella pero que desapareció «de forma irregular», explicó el abogado que representa a 35 presuntos estafados, Luis González.
«No han llevado a cabo ninguna liquidación ordinaria ni concurso ni ninguna forma normal de desaparición», indicó el letrado. Para González, se trataba de un complejo societario «tendente a engañar para quedarse con el dinero». La empresa del principal acusado, Darragh MacAnthony, estaba participada por una sociedad radicada en Perú y cuyo administrador es una persona de 90 años con domicilio en este país sudamericano, añadió.
Depurar responsabilidades. Las supuestas víctimas presentaron ayer sus pasaportes y ratificaron su querella en el juzgado de instrucción número 4 de Marbella. La mayoría proceden de Inglaterra e Irlanda y pagaron entre 10.000 y 40.000 euros cada uno por sus muebles, aunque el despacho marbellí que lleva el caso, Lawbird, calcula que las cantidades estafadas son millonarias y los afectados son muchos más de los que representan.
«Las operaciones se han hecho en masa, hablamos de cientos de afectados que han dado el dinero por perdido. Son cantidades importantes pero quizá no lo suficiente para que tengan que molestarse y venir a España a plantear una querella», argumentó.
La empresa de MacAnthony se presentaba como una entidad intermediaria que les presentaba los muebles por catálogo y que, supuestamente, los encargaba a los fabricantes, ubicados en países como Turquía. Esta característica se ofrecía como un ahorro para los compradores que tenían comprado sus inmuebles en otros países como Marruecos, Chipre, Bulgaria o Tailandia.
El principal acusado, Darragh MacAnthony, niega su responsabilidad en el asunto, tal como indicó el bufete que representa a los supuestos estafados. En la actualidad, MacAnthony es el propietario de un club de fútbol de la primera división inglesa.
«No sabemos exactamente dónde se encuentra. Sabemos que tiene domicilio en España y concretamente en Marbella», explicó González. «Vamos a ver las diligencias de averiguación que se realizan por los juzgados y policía para ver si lo pueden localizar. Queremos que acredite lo que tenga que acreditar», advirtió.
El objetivo de los querellantes es recuperar el dinero que desembolsaron pero, sobre todo, quieren que se depuren responsabilidades. «Queremos que se aclare todo», manifestaron ayer.
Pese a las muchas horas de vuelo acumuladas en el cuerpo y los 3.000 euros gastados en los billetes de avión para él y su mujer, John Andrews no perdía ayer la sonrisa cuando se le preguntaba por qué había decidido volar desde Tailandia, donde reside, hasta Marbella. «Quiero recuperar los 30.000 euros que me han estafado», comentaba a las puertas de los juzgados de la ciudad donde, junto a casi medio centenar de afectados, protagonizaba una pacífica concentración.
A SPANISH judge will decide whether football club boss Darragh MacAnthony will face charges after a raft of complaints from disgruntled customers who claim furniture ordered from his firm never arrived.
MacAnthony Realty International (MRI) developed resorts in several countries from its Marbella headquarters and sold furniture packs to clients.
Hugely popular on the holiday market, MRI had hundreds of Irish customers and boasted an annual turnover greater than €100m before the credit crunch.
It made the 35-year-old Dubliner, who now owns Peterborough Football Club, a multi-millionaire.
However, a group of 51 Irish and British buyers claim that €492,000 worth of furniture, ordered more than five years ago for apartments in Morocco, Bulgaria and Cape Verde, was never delivered.
Antonio Flores, the Spanish lawyer acting for the group, claims “many other” MRI customers are affected. He alleges that missing furniture is just one of the irregularities linked to MRI, or related companies.
He said that an additional claim, totalling €15m, is being prepared on behalf of 200 Irish and British MRI customers claiming that they lost large sums in upfront fees.
MRI has consistently denied any allegations of wrongdoing.
The initial complaint regarding furniture was referred to a Marbella court and is being heard by Judge Beatriz Gomez-Escolar at the Court of Instruction.
Under Spanish law, individuals can initiate criminal procedures in some cases.
The judge will now decide whether Mr MacAnthony and five other defendants should face the charges of “misappropriation of funds and theft by swindle”.
Among those wielding placards outside the Marbella court were claimants Brendan O’Dell (52), who works for a pharmaceutical company, and his partner Elizabeth Egan (52), from Corofin, Co Clare.
The couple paid €14,000 for a furniture pack for their Moroccan apartment which they claim was never delivered.
“It’s a joke. This has been dragging on for five years. Like everyone else here we are determined to get our money back,” Mr O’Dell said.
Claimants John and Muriel Andrews, from Ballycarry, Co Antrim, were also at the court. They paid MRI €29,900 in advance for two furniture packs, for apartments in Cape Verde, which they claim have never been delivered.
Efforts to contact Mr MacAnthony were unsuccessful last night. But he has previously said: “There are no foundations behind these allegations. I certainly didn’t do anything wrong and neither did anyone with MRI when I was there.”
He also said: “I operated a company which did thousands of sales around the world with many happy clients, but will forever be haunted by the few hundred for which it didn’t work out.”
In relation to undelivered furniture, the company has said the 2008 property crash forced several of its furniture suppliers out of business and it had to engage new ones — effectively paying twice for the same furniture order.
Also accused in the Spanish case are former MRI CEOs Michael Liggan and Dominic Pickering, Sarah O’Callaghan, and Nicola Shaw, a former director of MRI Ireland. The defendants face up to eight years in jail if convicted of the charges.
Marbella (Málaga), 16 ene (EFE).- La Audiencia Nacional (AN) ha resuelto no admitir a trámite la querella interpuesta contra bancos internacionales por la Asociación de Víctimas de la Hipoteca Inversa Extranjera por una presunta estafa.
Although the Danish Bank Tuesday clearly distanced themselves from tax-finten on the coast, the bank has offered tax-reduction programs through Luxembourg, which a few years ago were classified as tax havens.
Danish Bank has actively helped to reduce the tax for customers through tax havens.
It has a number of years until 2008, passed by the Danish Bank Luxembourg’s website that “you can reduce taxes on your earnings on investments, wealth tax and inheritance tax by placing your assets in the right structure.”
It also showed that as a resident in Spain must pay tax on its values, regardless of where they are located – whether it is deposit accounts, real estate, pensions, etc. So it was that which Danish Bank offered customers residing outside Denmark to avoid paying the tax through the counseling service is Wealth Planning, based in Luxembourg – a performance by the bank in fact still advertise. Now discussed Wealth Planning in conjunction with “tax-efficient solutions.”
Hides not money
CEO Klaus nsted Pedersen from the Danish International Bank has stated in the newspaper Jyllands-Posten’s article series on Sydbank model to borrow against property in Spain through Nykredit with the primary aim of reducing customers’ inheritance tax:
“The Danish Bank, we provide no advice for tax evasion. It is not something we make products. We help, of course, our customers optimize their economy, but we help them not to hide money for tax authorities. It is well established policy we have in this field that permeates our entire organization, “said the nsted Klaus Pedersen.
Jyllands-Posten is in possession of an exact correspondence between Danish Bank nsted Klaus Pedersen and the British MEP Sharon Bowles, who speak a financially pressed British couples action. The couple, who are in the 80s, in 2003, mortgaged their home equity in a luxury property in Spain with a mortgage to transfer money to third parties where they were invested.
The product is referred to as Equity Release Scheme, and can recall what Sydbank have offered to their Spanish customers. The letter states that the couple had been promised that the inheritance tax on their property could be avoided. The assets would be available through a private banking event in Luxembourg, as the couple made a profit on the transaction by investing their money in low-risk bonds.
Deficit: 268,000
It did not go so well with the investment. According to the letter to Klaus nsted Pedersen was ended with a deficit of 268,000 euros. Parliament member indicated also that experts believed that the model could not possibly make a profit because of the interest from mortgage loans. In addition, the couple had subsequently been informed that their heirs still would not respond Spanish property – and that they still had not been exempted from tax by using the model if it had been the case.
The letter, also sent to the Danish ambassador in London, Birger Riis-Jørgensen, also shows that the Danish Bank did not have permission to seek customers outside their Scandinavian customer base in Spain. The Danish Bank today do not share in.
Danish Bank Luxembourg director, Klaus nsted Pedersen, offered a settlement with the couple because the couple was about to be kicked out of their house because of the huge debt incurred after the event.
Submitted some of Jyllands-Posten’s record in this case says Klaus Pedersen nsted that wording tax reduction, the bank has previously spent several years on his website, is unfortunate:
“I remember formulating tax reduction. It is unfortunate that should have been tax optimization, “says Klaus nsted Pedersen, comparing its products with advice that you can avoid the top marginal tax rate by paying on an installment pension scheme.
Danish Bank director confirmed that the Luxembourg bank does not automatically transmit property to the Spanish authorities. It is the customer’s responsibility. But it’s not the reason why customers should choose Danish Bank Luxembourg than for example a Spanish bank:
Special expertise
“Our position is that you must pay tax in the country you live in. The reason why you should choose to be a customer of ours over a Spanish bank, is that we have an expertise in international relations as one not find in a Spanish or Danish bank. And so we speak Danish. Therefore it makes sense to be a customer in Luxembourg. ”
Klaus nsted Pedersen says that he can not comment on the specific case of the British couple. He said nevertheless:
“All bankers are experiencing disputes with clients after an unfortunate situation, then find a solution.”
Original Article in Danish
Danske Bank også med i spansk skattefinte
AF PETER NYHOLM og JULIE HORNBEK TOFT
Offentliggjort 16.01.12 kl. 06:57
Selv om Danske Bank tirsdag klart tog afstand fra skattely-finten på Solkysten, har banken tilbudt skatte-reduktionsprogrammer via Luxembourg, der for få år siden var klassificeret som skattely.
Foto: Jonas Pryner Andersen
Danske Bank har aktivt hjulpet med at reducere skatten for kunderne via skattely.
Det har i en årrække frem til 2008 fremgået af Danske Banks Luxembourgs hjemmeside, at »du kan reducere skatten på dit afkast fra investeringer, formueskat og arveafgift ved at placere dine aktiver i den rette struktur.«
Det fremgik også, at man som bosiddende i Spanien skal betale skat af sine værdier uanset, hvor i verden de er placeret – om det er indlånskonti, fast ejendom, pensioner osv. Det var altså det, som Danske Bank tilbød kunder bosiddende uden for Danmark at slippe billigere fra skattemæssigt via rådgivningsydelsen Wealth Planning med udgangspunkt i Luxembourg – en ydelse, som banken for øvrigt stadig reklamerer for. Nu omtales Wealth Planning sammen med »skatteeffektive løsninger«.
Skjuler ikke penge
Adm. direktør Klaus Mønsted Pedersen fra Danske Bank International udtalte følgende i Morgenavisen Jyllands-Postens artikelserie om Sydbanks model til belåne ejendomme i Spanien via Nykredit med det primære formål at reducere kundernes arveafgift:
»I Danske Bank yder vi ikke rådgivning med henblik på skatteunddragelse. Det er heller ikke noget, vi laver produkter til. Vi hjælper selvfølgelig vores kunder med at optimere deres økonomi, men vi hjælper dem ikke med at skjule penge for skattevæsnet. Det er en fasttømret politik, vi har på området, der gennemsyrer hele vores organisation,« lød det fra Klaus Mønsted Pedersen.
Jyllands-Posten er imidlertid i besiddelse af en korrespondance mellem netop Danske Banks Klaus Mønsted Pedersen og det britiske parlamentsmedlem Sharon Bowles, der taler et økonomisk presset britisk ægtepars sag. Parret, der er i 80’erne, belånte i 2003 deres friværdi i en luksusejendom i Spanien med et realkreditlån for at overføre pengene til tredjepart, hvor de blev investeret.
Produktet omtales som Equity Release Scheme, og kan minde om det, som Sydbank har tilbudt til deres spanske kunder. Af brevet fremgår det, at ægteparret var blevet stillet i udsigt, at arveafgift på deres ejendom kunne undgås. Formuen ville være tilgængelig via et private banking-arrangement i Luxembourg, ligesom ægteparret ville få overskud på transaktionen ved at investere deres penge i lavrisiko-obligationer.
Underskud: 268.000
Det gik dog ikke så godt med investeringen. Ifølge brevet til Klaus Mønsted Pedersen var det endt med et underskud på 268.000 euro. Parlamentsmedlemmet oplyste samtidig, at eksperter mente, at modellen umuligt kunne give overskud pga. renterne fra realkreditlånene. Hertil kommer, at ægteparret senere var blevet orienteret om, at deres arvinger alligevel ikke skulle svare spansk ejendomsskat – og at de alligevel ikke var blevet undtaget for skatten ved at bruge modellen, hvis det havde været tilfældet.
Af brevet, der også er sendt til den danske ambassadør i London, Birger Riis-Jørgensen, fremgår det også, at Danske Bank ikke havde tilladelse til at opsøge kunder uden for deres skandinaviske kundebase i Spanien. Det er Danske Bank i dag dog ikke enige i.
Danske Banks Luxembourg-direktør, Klaus Mønsted Pedersen, tilbød et forlig med parret, da ægteparret stod over for at blive smidt ud af deres hus pga. den store gæld opstået efter arrangementet.
Forelagt noget af Jyllands-Postens dokumentation i sagen oplyser Klaus Mønsted Pedersen, at ordvalget skattereduktion, som banken tidligere har brugt i en årrække på sin hjemmeside, er uheldigt:
»Jeg kan godt huske formuleringen skattereduktion. Den er uheldig, der skulle have stået skatteoptimering,« siger Klaus Mønsted Pedersen, som sammenligner bankens produkter med rådgivning i, at man kan undgå topskat ved at indbetale på en ratepensionsordning.
Danske Bank-direktøren bekræfter, at Luxembourg-banken ikke automatisk indberetter formueforhold til de spanske myndigheder. Det er kundens eget ansvar. Men det er ikke årsagen til, at kunderne skal vælge Danske Bank Luxembourg frem for eksempelvis en spansk bank:
Særlig ekspertise
»Vores holdning er, at man skal svare skat i det land, som man bor i. Grunden til, at man skal vælge at være kunde hos os frem for en spansk bank, er, at vi har en ekspertise i internationale forhold, som man ikke finder i en spansk eller dansk bank. Og så taler vi dansk. Derfor giver det mening at være kunde i Luxembourg.«
Klaus Mønsted Pedersen oplyser, at han ikke må kommentere den konkrete sag om det britiske ægtepar. Han siger dog alligevel:
»Alle bankfolk oplever tvister med kunder efter en uheldig situation, så finder man en løsning.«